Perry,
Good question and one that many people have addressed over the years. As you correctly say, for many we would require some soft tissue. For others, there is ample evidence within the fossils to have a good guess at the sounds they could have made. For still others, comparisons with crocodilians (a basal group) may be relevant (crocs make all kinds of sounds).
Probably the best example we have of skull morphology to influence sounds is a critter called Parasaurolophus (a large dinosaur of the so called ‘duck-billed dinosaurs’, the Hadrosauridae). In the early 1980’s, after much speculation about the function of this spectacular crest (a weapon, a snorkel etc.), it was speculated that as they were hollow and linked to the nasal nares, they may serve to assist in enhancing vocalisations and thus mate recognition and / or intraspecific display. Casts of various crested Hadrosaurids (the Lambeosaurinae) were replicated (with papier mache or something) and then blown through by the experimenters, enhancing sound and influencing tone, depending on the size and shape of the crest and the complexity of the hollow tubes within. So, by demonstrating the hypothesis as more probable than the others, this is the best explanation we have for the size and variety of crests. Modern interpretations have the crests often brightly coloured or joined to the body with flaps of skin, all to assist in mate recognition, competition etc. I’m sure some of the dino researchers out there may have more up-to-date information…
Hope this helps,
Dave.
Last edited by Dave Warburton (27th Nov 2007 10:26:06)